↓ Skip to main content

Using human artificial chromosomes to study centromere assembly and function

Overview of attention for article published in Chromosoma, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Using human artificial chromosomes to study centromere assembly and function
Published in
Chromosoma, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00412-017-0633-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oscar Molina, Natalay Kouprina, Hiroshi Masumoto, Vladimir Larionov, William C. Earnshaw

Abstract

Centromeres are the site of assembly of the kinetochore, which directs chromosome segregation during cell division. Active centromeres are characterized by the presence of nucleosomes containing CENP-A and a specific chromatin environment that resembles that of active genes. Recent work using human artificial chromosomes (HAC) sheds light on the fine balance of different histone post-translational modifications and transcription that exists at centromeres for kinetochore assembly and maintenance. Here, we review the use of HAC technology to understand centromere assembly and function. We put particular emphasis on studies using the alphoid(tetO) HAC, whose centromere can be specifically modified for epigenetic engineering studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 25%
Student > Bachelor 12 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Professor 3 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 58%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2017.
All research outputs
#13,326,031
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Chromosoma
#518
of 760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,467
of 313,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chromosoma
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 760 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.