| Title |
Assessment of wellness tourism development in Hokkaido: a multicriteria and strategic choice analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s41685-017-0042-4 |
| Authors |
João Romão, Kazuo Machino, Peter Nijkamp |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 17 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 32 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 14 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 36 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2017.
All research outputs
#7,778,844
of 23,636,051 outputs
Outputs from Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,732
of 318,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,636,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them