↓ Skip to main content

Reviews in Engineering Geology XVI: Humans as Geologic Agents

Overview of attention for book
Reviews in Engineering Geology XVI: Humans as Geologic Agents
Geological Society of America
Attention for Chapter: Impacts of land subsidence caused by withdrawal of underground fluids in the United States
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Impacts of land subsidence caused by withdrawal of underground fluids in the United States
Book title
Reviews in Engineering Geology XVI: Humans as Geologic Agents
Published in
US Geological Survey, January 2005
DOI 10.1130/2005.4016(08)
Book ISBNs
978-0-8137-4116-1
Authors

Thomas L. Holzer, Devin L. Galloway, Holzer, Thomas L., Galloway, Devin L.

Editors

Ehlen, Judy, Haneberg, W.C., Larson, R.A.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Mexico 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 105 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 19%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 7 6%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 25 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 35 32%
Environmental Science 17 15%
Engineering 15 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Psychology 1 <1%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 31 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2017.
All research outputs
#3,822,333
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#285
of 2,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,018
of 140,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.