You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
C-NAP1 and rootletin restrain DNA damage-induced centriole splitting and facilitate ciliogenesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell Cycle, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.4161/cc.21986 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pauline C. Conroy, Chiara Saladino, Tiago J. Dantas, Pierce Lalor, Peter Dockery, Ciaran G. Morrison |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 13 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2015.
All research outputs
#5,904,210
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Cell Cycle
#614
of 3,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,432
of 172,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Cycle
#9
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,693 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.