Title |
Obtaining common pruned trees
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Classification, December 1985
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf01908078 |
Authors |
C. R. Finden, A. D. Gordon |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
United States | 2 | 7% |
Italy | 1 | 3% |
Portugal | 1 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 3% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 21 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 27% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 23% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 20% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 2 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 40% |
Computer Science | 8 | 27% |
Mathematics | 3 | 10% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 7% |
Psychology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 2 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2013.
All research outputs
#5,655,726
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Classification
#19
of 94 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,811
of 42,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Classification
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.