↓ Skip to main content

Chromosome diversity and evolution in tribe Lilieae (Liliaceae) with emphasis on Chinese species

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Plant Research, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Chromosome diversity and evolution in tribe Lilieae (Liliaceae) with emphasis on Chinese species
Published in
Journal of Plant Research, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10265-011-0422-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yun-Dong Gao, Song-Dong Zhou, Xing-Jin He, Juan Wan

Abstract

In this paper, karyotype data of the tribe Lilieae in China were analyzed and been superimposed onto a phylogenetic framework constructed by the internal transcribed spacer to investigate the karyotype evolution. Ten parameters for analyzing karyotype asymmetry were assessed and karyotypic idiogram of five genera of Lilieae were illustrated. The results showed that, the relationship of genera in Lilieae that inferred from Maximum Parsimony criteria and Bayesian Inference were congruent with previous studies, which focused on higher level of Liliales. The karyotype showed distinctive among genera, mainly expressed on the location and amount of secondary constrictions and intercalary satellites: the genus Notholirion have neither of them, and the genera Cardiocrinum and Fritillaria have the secondary constriction alone; the genera Lilium and Nomocharis showed both features, and the distribute pattern of the intercalary satellites showed similarity among related clades. The asymmetry that assessed by several methods indicated that the evolution trend of Lilieae did not follow a single direction, but different in each genus. On the sectional level of the genus Lilium (including Nomocharis) the karyotype evolution included three major periods. Combining the chromosomal structure variations and karyotype asymmetry, the chromosome diversity and evolution in Lilieae were quite clear in the light of molecular inference.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 27%
Student > Master 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Professor 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 41%
Psychology 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Unknown 2 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2015.
All research outputs
#7,406,413
of 22,647,730 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Plant Research
#192
of 820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,351
of 109,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Plant Research
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,647,730 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 820 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.