↓ Skip to main content

What Truth Depends on

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Philosophical Logic, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 351)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
What Truth Depends on
Published in
Journal of Philosophical Logic, April 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10992-004-3758-3
Authors

Hannes Leitgeb

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Italy 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 26 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 30%
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Master 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 18 60%
Mathematics 2 7%
Linguistics 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 5 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2011.
All research outputs
#4,185,107
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Philosophical Logic
#23
of 351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,433
of 60,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Philosophical Logic
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 351 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them