↓ Skip to main content

Human Cardiosphere-Derived Cells from Patients with Chronic Ischaemic Heart Disease Can Be Routinely Expanded from Atrial but Not Epicardial Ventricular Biopsies

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Human Cardiosphere-Derived Cells from Patients with Chronic Ischaemic Heart Disease Can Be Routinely Expanded from Atrial but Not Epicardial Ventricular Biopsies
Published in
Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12265-012-9389-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen H. L. Chan, Zaal Meher Homji, Renata S. M. Gomes, Dominic Sweeney, George N. Thomas, Jun Jie Tan, Huajun Zhang, Filippo Perbellini, Daniel J. Stuckey, Suzanne M. Watt, David Taggart, Kieran Clarke, Enca Martin-Rendon, Carolyn A. Carr

Abstract

To investigate the effects of age and disease on endogenous cardiac progenitor cells, we obtained right atrial and left ventricular epicardial biopsies from patients (n = 22) with chronic ischaemic heart disease and measured doubling time and surface marker expression in explant- and cardiosphere-derived cells (EDCs, CDCs). EDCs could be expanded from all atrial biopsy samples, but sufficient cells for cardiosphere culture were obtained from only 8 of 22 ventricular biopsies. EDCs from both atrium and ventricle contained a higher proportion of c-kit+ cells than CDCs, which contained few such cells. There was wide variation in expression of CD90 (atrial CDCs 5-92 % CD90+; ventricular CDCs 11-89 % CD90+), with atrial CDCs cultured from diabetic patients (n = 4) containing 1.6-fold more CD90+ cells than those from non-diabetic patients (n = 18). No effect of age or other co-morbidities was detected. Thus, CDCs from atrial biopsies may vary in their therapeutic potential.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 14 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2013.
All research outputs
#5,471,359
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
#134
of 580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,748
of 164,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 580 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.