↓ Skip to main content

Free non-vascularized fibular strut bone graft for treatment of post-traumatic lower extremity large bone loss

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Free non-vascularized fibular strut bone graft for treatment of post-traumatic lower extremity large bone loss
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00590-013-1342-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kai-Cheng Lin, Yih-Wen Tarng, Chien-Jen Hsu, Jenn-Huei Renn

Abstract

Post-traumatic large bone defects of more than 4 cm occur sometimes in open lower extremity fractures. Management of this kind trauma can be a challenge to orthopedic surgeons. We have managed this kind of bone defect by the use of free non-vascularized fibular strut bone grafts (FNVFG) harvested subperiosteally and held by screw fixation of the strut ends to the ends of the bone defect. Ten patients, eight males and two females, with a mean age of 44 years (range 26-76 years) underwent this procedure. The length of defect was 7.0 cm on average (ranging from 4 to 8 cm). Ten grafts (100%) united at both ends within an average of 6 months (range 5-9 months). Nine patients walked independently, and one patient walked with a stick. FNVFG is a simple procedure and a reliable method to bridge huge bone loss due to open fractures of lower extremities successfully in selected cases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 31%
Other 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Decision Sciences 1 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2020.
All research outputs
#14,191,572
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#276
of 873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,859
of 211,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 873 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.