↓ Skip to main content

How effective are plant macrofossils as a proxy for macrophyte presence? The case of Najas flexilis in Scotland

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Paleolimnology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
How effective are plant macrofossils as a proxy for macrophyte presence? The case of Najas flexilis in Scotland
Published in
Journal of Paleolimnology, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10933-017-9988-5
Authors

Isabel J. Bishop, Helen Bennion, Ian R. Patmore, Carl D. Sayer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 30%
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Other 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 50%
Environmental Science 2 20%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2017.
All research outputs
#22,136,155
of 24,701,106 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Paleolimnology
#386
of 419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,814
of 317,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Paleolimnology
#12
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,701,106 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 419 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.