↓ Skip to main content

Neurotrophin Strategies for Neuroprotection: Are They Sufficient?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Neurotrophin Strategies for Neuroprotection: Are They Sufficient?
Published in
Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11481-014-9533-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph P. Steiner, Avindra Nath

Abstract

As people are living longer, the prevalance of neurodegenerative diseases continues to rise resulting in huge socio-economic consequences. Despite major advancements in studying the pathophysiology of these diseases and a large number of clinical trials currently there is no effective treatment for these illnesses. All neuroprotective strategies have either failed or have shown only a minimal effect. There has been a major shift in recent years exploring the potential of neuroregenerative approaches. While the concept of using neurotropins for therapeutic purposes has been in existence for many years, new modes of delivery and expression of this family of molecules makes this approach now feasilble. Further neurotropin mimetics and receptor agonists are also being developed. The use of small molecules to induce the expression of neurotropins including repurposing of FDA approved drugs for this approach is another strategy being pursued. In the review we examine these new developments and discuss the potential for such approaches in the context of the pathophysiology of neurodegenerative diseases.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 32%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Master 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Neuroscience 3 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 6 27%