↓ Skip to main content

The Processing of Color, Motion, and Stimulus Timing Are Anatomically Segregated in the Bumblebee Brain

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroscience, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Processing of Color, Motion, and Stimulus Timing Are Anatomically Segregated in the Bumblebee Brain
Published in
Journal of Neuroscience, June 2008
DOI 10.1523/jneurosci.1196-08.2008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angelique C. Paulk, James Phillips-Portillo, Andrew M. Dacks, Jean-Marc Fellous, Wulfila Gronenberg

Abstract

Animals use vision to perform such diverse behaviors as finding food, interacting socially with other animals, choosing a mate, and avoiding predators. These behaviors are complex and the visual system must process color, motion, and pattern cues efficiently so that animals can respond to relevant stimuli. The visual system achieves this by dividing visual information into separate pathways, but to what extent are these parallel streams separated in the brain? To answer this question, we recorded intracellularly in vivo from 105 morphologically identified neurons in the lobula, a major visual processing structure of bumblebees (Bombus impatiens). We found that these cells have anatomically segregated dendritic inputs confined to one or two of six lobula layers. Lobula neurons exhibit physiological characteristics common to their respective input layer. Cells with arborizations in layers 1-4 are generally indifferent to color but sensitive to motion, whereas layer 5-6 neurons often respond to both color and motion cues. Furthermore, the temporal characteristics of these responses differ systematically with dendritic branching pattern. Some layers are more temporally precise, whereas others are less precise but more reliable across trials. Because different layers send projections to different regions of the central brain, we hypothesize that the anatomical layers of the lobula are the structural basis for the segregation of visual information into color, motion, and stimulus timing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 2%
Australia 3 2%
China 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 176 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 29%
Researcher 46 24%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Student > Master 18 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 4%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 21 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 113 59%
Neuroscience 29 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Engineering 6 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 23 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,689,826
of 25,746,891 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#12,560
of 24,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,986
of 96,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#73
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,746,891 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.