↓ Skip to main content

Adverse Pregnancy Conditions, Infertility, and Future Cardiovascular Risk: Implications for Mother and Child

Overview of attention for article published in Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 697)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
43 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Adverse Pregnancy Conditions, Infertility, and Future Cardiovascular Risk: Implications for Mother and Child
Published in
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10557-015-6597-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ki Park, Janet Wei, Margo Minissian, C. Noel Bairey Merz, Carl J. Pepine

Abstract

Adverse pregnancy conditions in women are common and have been associated with adverse cardiovascular and metabolic outcomes such as myocardial infarction and stroke. As risk stratification in women is often suboptimal, recognition of non-traditional risk factors such as hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and premature delivery has become increasingly important. Additionally, such conditions may also increase the risk of cardiovascular disease in the children of afflicted women. In this review, we aim to highlight these conditions, along with infertility, and the association between such conditions and various cardiovascular outcomes and related maternal risk along with potential translation of risk to offspring. We will also discuss proposed mechanisms driving these associations as well as potential opportunities for screening and risk modification.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 20 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Linguistics 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 21 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 366. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2017.
All research outputs
#72,218
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy
#1
of 697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#750
of 267,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 697 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.