↓ Skip to main content

The Montara Oil Spill: A 2009 Well Blowout in the Timor Sea

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
The Montara Oil Spill: A 2009 Well Blowout in the Timor Sea
Published in
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00244-016-0356-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. B. Spies, M. Mukhtasor, K. A. Burns

Abstract

A well on the Montara platform on the Australian continental shelf blew out in August 2009 and spilled oil into the Timor Sea for 74 days. The oil, estimated at as much as 23.5 million L in total volume, spread over a large area of the shelf and eventually into Indonesian waters. This paper documents, through published literature, reports of both Australian and Indonesian governments and observations of coastal residents and fishermen the spread of the oil and attempts to estimate its impact. The lack of observers on the ocean and baseline, pre-spill data on populations of marine organisms, and delays in deploying scientific surveys after the spill severely limited efforts by the Australian government to determine damage in its territorial waters. Biological survey work was not done in Indonesian waters, but coastal residents attested to relatively severe impacts to algal farms. In addition fish landings declined in one port in southwest Timor Island.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 21%
Student > Master 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 16 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 12 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Engineering 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 18 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2017.
All research outputs
#16,300,483
of 24,024,220 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#1,583
of 2,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,995
of 315,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#19
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,024,220 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.