↓ Skip to main content

Coda waves: A review

Overview of attention for article published in Pure and Applied Geophysics, July 1987
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Coda waves: A review
Published in
Pure and Applied Geophysics, July 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf00879572
Authors

M. Herraiz, A. F. Espinosa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
China 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 98 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 34%
Researcher 18 18%
Student > Master 7 7%
Professor 5 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 43 42%
Engineering 17 17%
Physics and Astronomy 9 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 24 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,959,162
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Pure and Applied Geophysics
#188
of 881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,298
of 11,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pure and Applied Geophysics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them