↓ Skip to main content

Proportional rules for state contingent claims

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Game Theory, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Proportional rules for state contingent claims
Published in
International Journal of Game Theory, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00182-017-0585-7
Authors

Sinan Ertemel, Rajnish Kumar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 33%
Engineering 1 11%
Unknown 5 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2018.
All research outputs
#12,928,447
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Game Theory
#83
of 160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,658
of 312,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Game Theory
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 160 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them