↓ Skip to main content

Identifying high-frequency attendees in general practice

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying high-frequency attendees in general practice
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, June 2017
DOI 10.3399/bjgp17x691529
Pubmed ID
Authors

Glenda Anne Cook, Akhtar Ali, Roger Dykins, Robin Hudson, Julie Johnston, Jill Mitchell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 50%
Computer Science 1 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2017.
All research outputs
#4,461,602
of 24,838,271 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,762
of 4,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,703
of 320,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#44
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,838,271 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.