| Title |
Generalized Voronoi Tessellation as a Model of Two-dimensional Cell Tissue Dynamics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11538-009-9498-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin Bock, Amit Kumar Tyagi, Jan-Ulrich Kreft, Wolfgang Alt |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 106 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 37% |
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 4% |
| Professor | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 21 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 20% |
| Engineering | 15 | 13% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 11 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 22% |
| Unknown | 25 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2017.
All research outputs
#7,533,912
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#300
of 1,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,204
of 165,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,103 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.