↓ Skip to main content

Silica, silicosis and lung-cancer: results from a cohort study in the stone and quarry industry

Overview of attention for article published in International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, May 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Silica, silicosis and lung-cancer: results from a cohort study in the stone and quarry industry
Published in
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, May 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00420-004-0513-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. Ulm, P. Gerein, J. Eigenthaler, S. Schmidt, H. Ehnes

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 22%
Student > Master 4 13%
Other 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 7 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 31%
Environmental Science 7 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 8 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,856,604
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
#802
of 1,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,322
of 59,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.