↓ Skip to main content

Occurrence of glyphosate and acidic herbicides in select urban rivers and streams in Canada, 2007

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
Occurrence of glyphosate and acidic herbicides in select urban rivers and streams in Canada, 2007
Published in
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, September 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11356-011-0600-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nancy E. Glozier, John Struger, Allan J. Cessna, Melissa Gledhill, Myriam Rondeau, William R. Ernst, Mark A. Sekela, Steve J. Cagampan, Ed Sverko, Clair Murphy, Janine L. Murray, David B. Donald

Abstract

Public and scientific concern has grown over the last decade in Canada over the cosmetic use of pesticides in urban centers. With this in mind, a national survey was designed to monitor eight commonly used herbicides in urban rivers and streams across Canada. To coordinate sample collections across the country, samples were collected monthly on one of two predetermined dates from April to September, 2007 from 19 sites within 16 watersheds, including 15 sites downstream of urban lands and two reference sites. Water samples were also collected approximately three times from each watershed during or after precipitation events. All samples were collected using a common sampling protocol and all were analyzed using the same analytical laboratories. The herbicides 2,4-D, mecoprop, dicamba, glyphosate and its major metabolite aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) were most frequently detected. Using either herbicide concentrations upstream/downstream of urban centers or bromoxynil and clopyralid as indictors of agricultural inputs of herbicides to streams, it was clear that environmental concentrations of these herbicides downstream of urban areas were linked to urban use in Canada. Herbicide concentrations in streams draining urban areas were greater during or after significant rainfall events and, with the exception of glyphosate, were significantly greater in the Province of Ontario. Herbicide concentrations were not correlated to the proportion of the watersheds in urban land use. Also, there was no difference in seasonal patterns of herbicide concentrations across urban centers when grouped in five geographic areas. None of the herbicide concentrations measured exceeded existing Canadian Water Quality Guidelines for the protection of aquatic life. This is the first time a national survey of pesticides in urban rivers has been carried out in a consistent fashion across Canada. Concentrations of 2,4-D, mecoprop, dicamba, glyphosate, and AMPA were linked to urban use and frequently detected in all geographic areas. However, geographic differences in concentration suggested differences in usage or stream connectivity patterns among urban centers. Some jurisdictions in Canada have recently restricted cosmetic use of pesticides and it would be interesting to determine whether such restrictions will lead to reduced pesticide concentrations in urban streams.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Ireland 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 91 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 23%
Researcher 17 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Other 6 6%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 26 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 22%
Chemistry 7 7%
Engineering 4 4%
Chemical Engineering 4 4%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 16 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2017.
All research outputs
#5,033,437
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#973
of 9,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,558
of 133,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,883 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.