| Title |
Economic Analysis for the UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis and Scenario Valuation of Changes in Ecosystem Services
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental and Resource Economics, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10640-013-9662-y |
| Authors |
Ian J. Bateman, Amii R. Harwood, David J. Abson, Barnaby Andrews, Andrew Crowe, Steve Dugdale, Carlo Fezzi, Jo Foden, David Hadley, Roy Haines-Young, Mark Hulme, Andreas Kontoleon, Paul Munday, Unai Pascual, James Paterson, Grischa Perino, Antara Sen, Gavin Siriwardena, Mette Termansen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Madagascar | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 201 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 23% |
| Researcher | 44 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 47 | 22% |
| Unknown | 30 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 61 | 29% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 41 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 10% |
| Unknown | 52 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,146,861
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental and Resource Economics
#289
of 1,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,274
of 219,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental and Resource Economics
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.