↓ Skip to main content

Does the teaching of probability improve probabilistic intuitions?

Overview of attention for article published in Educational Studies in Mathematics, February 1984
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Does the teaching of probability improve probabilistic intuitions?
Published in
Educational Studies in Mathematics, February 1984
DOI 10.1007/bf00380436
Authors

E. Fischbein, A. Gazit

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 8 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 9 38%
Mathematics 2 8%
Philosophy 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2001.
All research outputs
#7,533,912
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Educational Studies in Mathematics
#303
of 810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,594
of 35,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational Studies in Mathematics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 810 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them