↓ Skip to main content

Hypoxia in cervical cancer: from biology to imaging

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Imaging, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Hypoxia in cervical cancer: from biology to imaging
Published in
Clinical and Translational Imaging, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40336-017-0238-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heidi Lyng, Eirik Malinen

Abstract

Hypoxia imaging may improve identification of cervical cancer patients at risk of treatment failure and be utilized in treatment planning and monitoring, but its clinical potential is far from fully realized. Here, we briefly describe the biology of hypoxia in cervix tumors of relevance for imaging, and evaluate positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques that have shown promise for assessing hypoxia in a clinical setting. We further discuss emerging imaging approaches, and how imaging can play a role in future treatment strategies to target hypoxia. We performed a PubMed literature search, using keywords related to imaging and hypoxia in cervical cancer, with a particular emphasis on studies correlating imaging with other hypoxia measures and treatment outcome. Only a few and rather small studies have utilized PET with tracers specific for hypoxia, and no firm conclusions regarding preferred tracer or clinical potential can be drawn so far. Most studies address indirect hypoxia imaging with dynamic contrast-enhanced techniques. Strong evidences for a role of these techniques in hypoxia imaging have been presented. Pre-treatment images have shown significant association to outcome in several studies, and images acquired during fractionated radiotherapy may further improve risk stratification. Multiparametric MRI and multimodality PET/MRI enable combined imaging of factors of relevance for tumor hypoxia and warrant further investigation. Several imaging approaches have shown promise for hypoxia imaging in cervical cancer. Evaluation in large clinical trials is required to decide upon the optimal modality and approach.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 20 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 26%
Physics and Astronomy 7 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 7%
Engineering 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 25 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2018.
All research outputs
#14,355,066
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Imaging
#125
of 233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,486
of 312,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Imaging
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 233 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.