↓ Skip to main content

On Reduction Rules, Meaning-as-use, and Proof-theoretic Semantics

Overview of attention for article published in Studia Logica, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 307)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
On Reduction Rules, Meaning-as-use, and Proof-theoretic Semantics
Published in
Studia Logica, October 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11225-008-9150-5
Authors

Ruy J. G. B. de Queiroz

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 31%
Student > Master 4 31%
Researcher 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 4 31%
Computer Science 2 15%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Mathematics 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,533,912
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Studia Logica
#37
of 307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,539
of 91,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Studia Logica
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 307 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them