↓ Skip to main content

Roles of Activated Microglia in Hypoxia Induced Neuroinflammation in the Developing Brain and the Retina

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
164 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
Title
Roles of Activated Microglia in Hypoxia Induced Neuroinflammation in the Developing Brain and the Retina
Published in
Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11481-012-9347-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charanjit Kaur, Gurugirijha Rathnasamy, Eng-Ang Ling

Abstract

Amoeboid microglial cells (AMCs) in the developing brain display surface receptors and antigens shared by the monocyte-derived tissue macrophages. Activation of AMCs in the perinatal brain has been associated with periventricular white matter damage in hypoxic-ischemic conditions. The periventricular white matter, where the AMCs preponderate, is selectively vulnerable to hypoxia as manifested by death of premyelinating oligodendrocytes and degeneration of axons leading to neonatal mortality and long-term neurodevelopmental deficits. AMCs respond vigorously to hypoxia by producing excess amounts of inflammatory cytokines e.g. the tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) along with glutamate, nitric oxide (NO) and reactive oxygen species which collectively cause oligodendrocyte death, axonal degeneration as well as disruption of the immature blood brain barrier. A similar phenomenon is observed in the hypoxic developing cerebellum in which activated AMCs induced Purkinje neuronal death through production of TNF-α and IL-1β via their respective receptors. Hypoxia is also implicated in retinopathy of prematurity in which activation of AMCs has been shown to cause retinal ganglion cell death through production of TNF-α and IL-1β and NO. Because AMCs play a pivotal role in hypoxic injuries in the developing brain affecting both neurons and oligodendrocytes, a fuller understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms of microglial activation under such conditions would be desirable for designing of a novel therapeutic strategy for management of hypoxic damage.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 131 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 17%
Student > Master 21 16%
Researcher 20 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 28 21%
Unknown 24 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 25%
Neuroscience 30 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 28 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2014.
All research outputs
#19,702,729
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology
#453
of 583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,137
of 158,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.