| Title |
Repeated glacial-lake outburst floods in Patagonia: an increasing hazard?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Hazards, November 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11069-009-9479-8 |
| Authors |
Alejandro Dussaillant, Gerardo Benito, Wouter Buytaert, Paul Carling, Claudio Meier, Fabián Espinoza |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 8 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 212 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 44 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 20 | 9% |
| Other | 34 | 15% |
| Unknown | 30 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 104 | 46% |
| Environmental Science | 46 | 20% |
| Engineering | 12 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Unknown | 38 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2012.
All research outputs
#3,307,385
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#382
of 1,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,923
of 94,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them