↓ Skip to main content

Controls on salt marsh accretion: A test in salt marshes of Eastern Canada

Overview of attention for article published in Estuaries and Coasts, February 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
Title
Controls on salt marsh accretion: A test in salt marshes of Eastern Canada
Published in
Estuaries and Coasts, February 2004
DOI 10.1007/bf02803561
Authors

Gail L. Chmura, Grace A. Hung

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 119 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 23%
Researcher 24 19%
Student > Master 21 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 21 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 43 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 16%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 27 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2007.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Estuaries and Coasts
#498
of 1,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,615
of 146,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Estuaries and Coasts
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,847 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them