| Title |
The causal structure of vulnerability: Its application to climate impact analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
GeoJournal, February 1995
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00814058 |
| Authors |
Jesse C. Ribot |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 4% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 27% |
| Researcher | 24 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 35 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 33 | 29% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,714,490
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from GeoJournal
#66
of 737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,663
of 76,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GeoJournal
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them