↓ Skip to main content

Greenhouse gas emissions during co-composting of cattle mortalities with manure

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Greenhouse gas emissions during co-composting of cattle mortalities with manure
Published in
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, January 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10705-006-9083-1
Authors

Shanwei Xu, Xiying Hao, Kim Stanford, Tim McAllister, Francis J. Larney, Jingguo Wang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 3%
Unknown 32 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Researcher 5 15%
Other 3 9%
Professor 3 9%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 45%
Environmental Science 6 18%
Engineering 3 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2007.
All research outputs
#7,533,912
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
#141
of 506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,209
of 161,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 506 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.