| Title |
Interactive effects of elevated CO2, N deposition and climate change on plant litter quality in a California annual grassland
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, November 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00442-004-1713-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hugh A. L. Henry, Elsa E. Cleland, Christopher B. Field, Peter M. Vitousek |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 6 | 3% |
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| China | 2 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 161 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 52 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 12% |
| Professor | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 33 | 18% |
| Unknown | 21 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 89 | 49% |
| Environmental Science | 46 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 28 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2007.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,960
of 4,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,127
of 159,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#9
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.