| Title |
Elevated CO2, litter chemistry, and decomposition: a synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, April 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s004420000615 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard J. Norby, M. Francesca Cotrufo, Philip Ineson, Elizabeth G. O’Neill, Josep G. Canadell |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 343 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| Brazil | 5 | 1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Poland | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Finland | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 3% |
| Unknown | 309 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 77 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 69 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 28 | 8% |
| Professor | 26 | 8% |
| Other | 64 | 19% |
| Unknown | 40 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 141 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 102 | 30% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 21 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 4% |
| Unknown | 57 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2007.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#2,058
of 4,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,313
of 44,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#6
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.