↓ Skip to main content

HYDROLOGIC CHANGE AND VEGETATION OF TIDAL FRESHWATER MARSHES: FIELD, GREENHOUSE, AND SEED-BANK EXPERIMENTS

Overview of attention for article published in Wetlands, December 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
Title
HYDROLOGIC CHANGE AND VEGETATION OF TIDAL FRESHWATER MARSHES: FIELD, GREENHOUSE, AND SEED-BANK EXPERIMENTS
Published in
Wetlands, December 2001
DOI 10.1672/0277-5212(2001)021[0519:hcavot]2.0.co;2
Authors

Andrew H. Baldwin, Michael S. Egnotovich, Ernest Clarke

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 5%
Brazil 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 120 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 21%
Researcher 26 20%
Student > Master 25 19%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 5%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 15 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 41%
Environmental Science 42 32%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 9%
Engineering 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 14 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2007.
All research outputs
#7,533,912
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Wetlands
#226
of 1,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,185
of 124,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wetlands
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,249 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them