↓ Skip to main content

Modelling Indonesian rainfall with a coupled regional model

Overview of attention for article published in Climate Dynamics, May 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Modelling Indonesian rainfall with a coupled regional model
Published in
Climate Dynamics, May 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00382-004-0483-0
Authors

Edvin Aldrian, Dmitry Sein, Daniela Jacob, Lydia Dümenil Gates, Ralf Podzun

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 4%
Indonesia 1 1%
Unknown 73 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 22%
Researcher 16 21%
Student > Master 12 16%
Lecturer 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 35 45%
Environmental Science 13 17%
Mathematics 4 5%
Engineering 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 13 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2007.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#2,220
of 5,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,950
of 71,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.