↓ Skip to main content

The carbon charging of pines at the climatic treeline: a global comparison

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
274 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
Title
The carbon charging of pines at the climatic treeline: a global comparison
Published in
Oecologia, January 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00442-002-1154-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Günter Hoch, Christian Körner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Germany 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Italy 3 1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 184 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 60 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 24%
Student > Master 22 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 6%
Professor 13 6%
Other 39 19%
Unknown 12 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 91 44%
Environmental Science 66 32%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 18 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 26 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2007.
All research outputs
#7,533,912
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,683
of 4,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,747
of 129,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#4
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.