↓ Skip to main content

Adaptation to What and Why?

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, March 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
Title
Adaptation to What and Why?
Published in
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, March 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1006393415542
Authors

A.B. Pittock, R.N. Jones

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 104 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 20%
Student > Master 19 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 7%
Professor 6 6%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 20 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 26 24%
Social Sciences 26 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 25 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2007.
All research outputs
#8,880,246
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
#678
of 3,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,471
of 43,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,240 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 43,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.