↓ Skip to main content

An Improved Statistical-Dynamical Downscaling Scheme and its Application to the Alpine Precipitation Climatology

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical and Applied Climatology, April 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
An Improved Statistical-Dynamical Downscaling Scheme and its Application to the Alpine Precipitation Climatology
Published in
Theoretical and Applied Climatology, April 2000
DOI 10.1007/s007040070038
Authors

U. Fuentes, D. Heimann

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 3%
United States 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 57 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Professor 5 8%
Unspecified 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 11 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 21 34%
Engineering 9 15%
Environmental Science 8 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Unspecified 4 6%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 11 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2007.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Climatology
#1,109
of 1,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,852
of 40,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Climatology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them