↓ Skip to main content

Downscaling ability of one-way nested regional climate models: the Big-Brother Experiment

Overview of attention for article published in Climate Dynamics, April 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
260 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Downscaling ability of one-way nested regional climate models: the Big-Brother Experiment
Published in
Climate Dynamics, April 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00382-001-0201-0
Authors

B. Denis, R. Laprise, D. Caya, J. Côté

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 5 3%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 151 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 22%
Student > Master 13 8%
Professor 10 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 23 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 67 40%
Environmental Science 40 24%
Engineering 13 8%
Physics and Astronomy 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 28 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2007.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#2,314
of 5,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,129
of 130,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.