Title |
Importance of bioavailable calcium drinking water for the maintenance of bone mass in post-menopausal women
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf03343658 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
D. Costi, P. G. Calcaterra, N. Iori, S. Vourna, G. Nappi, M. Passeri |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 18 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 3 | 16% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 3 | 16% |
Engineering | 2 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 10 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,247,598
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Endocrinological Investigation
#44
of 1,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,342
of 221,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Endocrinological Investigation
#9
of 426 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 426 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.