↓ Skip to main content

Optimal filtering for Bayesian detection and attribution of climate change

Overview of attention for article published in Climate Dynamics, December 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Optimal filtering for Bayesian detection and attribution of climate change
Published in
Climate Dynamics, December 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00382-004-0456-3
Authors

R. Schnur, Kl. Hasselmann

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Germany 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 49 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 42%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 21%
Lecturer 3 6%
Student > Master 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 10 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 18 34%
Environmental Science 13 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Engineering 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 10 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,533,912
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#2,029
of 4,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,136
of 140,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.