↓ Skip to main content

An eddy-permitting oceanic general circulation model and its preliminary evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
An eddy-permitting oceanic general circulation model and its preliminary evaluation
Published in
Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, October 2004
DOI 10.1007/bf02916365
Authors

Liu Hailong, Zhang Xuehong, Li Wei, Yu Yongqiang, Yu Rucong

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 33%
Lecturer 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 39%
Environmental Science 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2007.
All research outputs
#7,533,912
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Atmospheric Sciences
#388
of 871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,952
of 61,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Atmospheric Sciences
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them