| Title |
Assessment of the plume dispersion due to chemical attack on April 4, 2017, in Syria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Hazards, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11069-017-2936-x |
| Authors |
Kiran Bhaganagar, Sudheer R. Bhimireddy |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
| Researcher | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 4 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 6 | 23% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 19% |
| Unknown | 7 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 107. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2018.
All research outputs
#333,614
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#21
of 1,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,843
of 314,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#1
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.