↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of mental disorders and torture among Tibetan refugees: A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Prevalence of mental disorders and torture among Tibetan refugees: A systematic review
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2005
DOI 10.1186/1472-698x-5-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edward J Mills, Sonal Singh, Timothy H Holtz, Robert M Chase, Sonam Dolma, Joanna Santa-Barbara, James J Orbinski

Abstract

Many Tibetan refugees flee Tibet in order to escape physical and mental hardships, and to access the freedoms to practice their culture and religion. We aimed to determine the prevalence of mental illnesses within the refugee population and determine the prevalence of previous torture reported within this population.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Australia 2 2%
Taiwan 1 1%
Unknown 81 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 23%
Social Sciences 14 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 22 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2017.
All research outputs
#8,261,756
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,130
of 17,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,456
of 76,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#11
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.