↓ Skip to main content

Effects of the Repeal of Missouri’s Handgun Purchaser Licensing Law on Homicides

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Urban Health, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 1,734)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
82 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
151 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Effects of the Repeal of Missouri’s Handgun Purchaser Licensing Law on Homicides
Published in
Journal of Urban Health, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11524-014-9865-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Webster, Cassandra Kercher Crifasi, Jon S. Vernick

Abstract

In the USA, homicide is a leading cause of death for young males and a major cause of racial disparities in life expectancy for men. There are intense debate and little rigorous research on the effects of firearm sales regulation on homicides. This study estimates the impact of Missouri's 2007 repeal of its permit-to-purchase (PTP) handgun law on states' homicide rates and controls for changes in poverty, unemployment, crime, incarceration, policing levels, and other policies that could potentially affect homicides. Using death certificate data available through 2010, the repeal of Missouri's PTP law was associated with an increase in annual firearm homicides rates of 1.09 per 100,000 (+23%) but was unrelated to changes in non-firearm homicide rates. Using Uniform Crime Reporting data from police through 2012, the law's repeal was associated with increased annual murders rates of 0.93 per 100,000 (+16%). These estimated effects translate to increases of between 55 and 63 homicides per year in Missouri.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 151 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 100 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 15%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 28 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 23 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 21%
Psychology 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 33 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 816. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#23,396
of 25,877,363 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Urban Health
#4
of 1,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119
of 236,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Urban Health
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,877,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.