You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Injury and illness definitions and data collection procedures for use in epidemiological studies in Athletics (track and field): Consensus statement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Sports Medicine, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093241 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Toomas Timpka, Juan-Manuel Alonso, Jenny Jacobsson, Astrid Junge, Pedro Branco, Ben Clarsen, Jan Kowalski, Margo Mountjoy, Sverker Nilsson, Babette Pluim, Per Renström, Ola Rønsen, Kathrin Steffen, Pascal Edouard |
| Abstract |
Movement towards sport safety in Athletics through the introduction of preventive strategies requires consensus on definitions and methods for reporting epidemiological data in the various populations of athletes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 7% |
| Australia | 3 | 5% |
| Spain | 3 | 5% |
| Sweden | 3 | 5% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 34 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 56% |
| Scientists | 18 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 370 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 361 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 61 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 56 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 13% |
| Researcher | 24 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 65 | 18% |
| Unknown | 96 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 106 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Psychology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 5% |
| Unknown | 114 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2019.
All research outputs
#924,241
of 25,392,205 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#1,662
of 6,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,852
of 232,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#23
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.