You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High vulnerability of ecosystem function and services to diversity loss in Caribbean coral reefs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.029 |
| Authors |
Fiorenza Micheli, Peter J. Mumby, Daniel R. Brumbaugh, Kenny Broad, Craig P. Dahlgren, Alastair R. Harborne, Katherine E. Holmes, Carrie V. Kappel, Steven Y. Litvin, James N. Sanchirico |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 448 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 7 | 2% |
| Mexico | 4 | <1% |
| Colombia | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Mozambique | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 422 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 86 | 19% |
| Researcher | 72 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 71 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 63 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 72 | 16% |
| Unknown | 62 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 174 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 139 | 31% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 24 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Engineering | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 23 | 5% |
| Unknown | 72 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2019.
All research outputs
#7,629,858
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#4,073
of 6,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,985
of 240,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#48
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.