You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Advances in IBD genetics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.27 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Johan Van Limbergen, Graham Radford-Smith, Jack Satsangi |
| Abstract |
IBD is a spectrum of chronic disorders that constitute an important health problem worldwide. The hunt for genetic determinants of disease onset and course has culminated in the Immunochip project, which has identified >160 loci containing IBD susceptibility genes. In this Review, we highlight how genetic association studies have informed our understanding of the pathogenesis of IBD by focusing research efforts on key pathways involved in innate immunity, autophagy, lymphocyte differentiation and chemotaxis. Several of these novel genetic markers and cellular pathways are promising candidates for patient stratification and therapeutic targeting. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 192 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 25% |
| Researcher | 35 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 10% |
| Professor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 39 | 19% |
| Unknown | 17 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 13 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2015.
All research outputs
#14,776,077
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology
#1,474
of 2,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,441
of 220,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology
#20
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.