↓ Skip to main content

Does labeling matter? An examination of attitudes and perceptions of labels for mental disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
Title
Does labeling matter? An examination of attitudes and perceptions of labels for mental disorders
Published in
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00127-012-0532-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew C. H. Szeto, Dorothy Luong, Keith S. Dobson

Abstract

Labeling research in various domains has found that attitudes and perceptions vary as a function of the different labels ascribed to a group (e.g., overweight vs. obese). This type of research, however, has not been examined extensively in regards to labels for mental disorders. The present study examined whether common psychiatric labels (i.e., mental disease, mental disorders, mental health problems, and mental illness) elicited divergent attitudes and perceptions in a group of participants. These labels were also compared to the specific label of depression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 129 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 23%
Student > Master 24 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Researcher 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 58 44%
Social Sciences 14 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Arts and Humanities 4 3%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 25 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,108,935
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#599
of 2,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,375
of 166,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#6
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.