You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Revascularization Outcomes: A Prospective Analysis of 16 Consecutive Cases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Endodontics, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.032 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bill Kahler, Sonali Mistry, Alex Moule, Andrew K. Ringsmuth, Peter Case, Andrew Thomson, Trevor Holcombe |
| Abstract |
Recent reviews lament the lack of evidence on the efficacy of regenerative procedures to induce further root maturation despite claims of a paradigm shift in the way infected, necrotic immature teeth with arrested root development can be endodontically treated. The majority of reports are either case series or successful case reports where nonstandardized images may make interpretation uncertain. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| Mexico | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 250 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 51 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 34 | 13% |
| Researcher | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 53 | 21% |
| Unknown | 63 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 159 | 63% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 69 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2014.
All research outputs
#16,048,318
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Endodontics
#1,065
of 2,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,327
of 321,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Endodontics
#15
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,291 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.