↓ Skip to main content

A CASE REPORT OF ADENOCARCINOMA OF MECKEL'S DIVERTICULUM

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association), January 1993
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A CASE REPORT OF ADENOCARCINOMA OF MECKEL'S DIVERTICULUM
Published in
Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association), January 1993
DOI 10.3919/ringe1963.54.2125
Authors

Kazuhiro HIRAMATSU, Mamoru SEKIMOTO, Hiroshi HASEGAWA, Takaaki NAKAMURA

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2023.
All research outputs
#15,168,167
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association)
#79
of 178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,529
of 65,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association)
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 178 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.