↓ Skip to main content

Nitrogen availability limits phosphorus uptake in an intertidal macroalga

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Nitrogen availability limits phosphorus uptake in an intertidal macroalga
Published in
Oecologia, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00442-014-2914-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valerie Perini, Matthew E. S. Bracken

Abstract

Nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) limit primary productivity, and recent anthropogenic activities are changing the availability of these nutrients, leading to alterations in the type and magnitude of nutrient limitation. Recent work highlights the potential for N and P to interact to limit primary production in terrestrial and freshwater systems. However, mechanisms underlying co-limitation are not well described. Documentation of ambient nutrient levels and tissue nutrients of the intertidal macroalga Fucus vesiculosus for 2 years in the southern Gulf of Maine, USA, indicates that N availability may be impacting the ability of F. vesiculosus to access P, despite relatively high ambient P concentrations. To experimentally validate these observations, F. vesiculosus individuals were enriched with N or P for 6 weeks, followed by an uptake experiment to examine how the interactions between these nutrients affected macroalgal N and P uptake efficiency. Results illustrate that exposure of seaweed to different nutrient regimes influenced nutrient uptake efficiency. Notably, seaweeds enriched with N displayed the highest P uptake efficiency at low, biologically relevant, P concentrations. Our results confirm that N availability may be mediating the ability of primary producers to access P. These interactions between limiting nutrients have implications for not only the growth and functioning of primary producers who rely directly on these nutrients but also the entire communities that they support.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 86 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 21%
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 17 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 38%
Environmental Science 19 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 4%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 22 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2014.
All research outputs
#12,895,492
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#2,828
of 4,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,203
of 220,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#13
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.